Lawmaker says communication on private devices should stay that way; court seems to disagree
Newswire: Jan. 11, 2018.
Dateline: Phoenix, Ariz.
An Arizona lawmaker wants to carve out an exemption in state public records laws to electronic records stored on public officials’ private devices, setting up an intriguing fight over what is a public record, or even what is an electronic record.
Rep. Bob Thorpe (R-Flagstaff) introduced the proposal weeks after Arizona’s Court of Appeals ruled that public officials’ communications on private devices still are subject to state public records law.
Thorpe said he introduced the measure because of “conflicting and confusing court rulings” on the matter. He says that state public records law should cover state-issued devices meant for public officials’ use.
“If I’m paying the monthly phone bill on my personal device, I think thouse records ought to belong to me,” he argued.
However, the appellate court’s recent ruling covered public safety employees who admitted that they routinely use personal devices to discuss official business. Moreover, a 2007 ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court declared that a public record isn’t decided by where it is stored, but whether the document itself is part of public business.
Critics say that the proposal from Thorpe, a volunteer firefighter before he became a state legislator in 2013, shows his and others’ desire to skirt open government laws by using personal devices.
Read the full story here.